Advertisement
Journal Home
Search for

Volume 38, Issue 2, Pages 197-204 (February 2007)


View previous. 6 of 31 View next.

Identification of a basal-like subtype of breast ductal carcinoma in situ

Chad A. Livasy, MDadCorresponding Author Informationemail address, Charles M. Perou, PhDabd, Gamze Karaca, MScbd, David W. Cowan, BSd, Diane Maia, MDa, Susan Jackson, MPAd, Chiu-Kit Tse, MSPHd, Sarah Nyante, MSPHc, Robert C. Millikan, PhD, DVMcd

Received 7 July 2006; received in revised form 23 August 2006; accepted 24 August 2006.

Summary 

Microarray profiling of invasive breast carcinomas has identified subtypes including luminal A, luminal B, HER2-overexpressing, and basal-like. The poor-prognosis, basal-like tumors have been immunohistochemically characterized as estrogen receptor (ER)–negative, HER2/neu–negative, and cytokeratin 5/6–positive and/or epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)–positive. The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence of basal-like ductal carcinoma in situ in a population-based series of cases using immunohistochemical surrogates. A total of 245 pure ductal carcinoma in situ cases from a population-based, case-control study were evaluated for histologic characteristics and immunostained for ER, HER2/neu, EGFR, cytokeratin 5/6, p53, and Ki-67. The subtypes were defined as: luminal A (ER+, HER2−), luminal B (ER+, HER2+), HER2 positive (ER−, HER2+), and basal-like (ER−, HER2−, EGFR+, and/or cytokeratin 5/6+). The prevalence of breast cancer subtypes was basal-like (n = 19 [8%]); luminal A, n = 149 (61%); luminal B, n = 23 (9%); and HER2+/ER−, n = 38 (16%). Sixteen tumors (6%) were unclassified (negative for all 4 defining markers). The basal-like subtype was associated with unfavorable prognostic variables including high-grade nuclei (P < .0001), p53 overexpression (P < .0001), and elevated Ki-67 index (P < .0001). These studies demonstrate the presence of a basal-like in situ carcinoma, a potential precursor lesion to invasive basal-like carcinoma.

a Department of Pathology and Lab Medicine, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-7525, USA

b Department of Genetics, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-7525, USA

c Department of Epidemiology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-7525, USA

d Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-7525, USA

Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Department of Pathology and Lab Medicine, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-7525, USA.

 This work was supported by an award to the University of North Carolina for a Breast Cancer Specialized Program of Research Excellence (SPORE) from the National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD (CA58223), by the NCI (RO1-CA-101227-01) to C.M.P., and by the Breast Cancer Research Foundation, New York, NY.

PII: S0046-8177(06)00534-X

doi:10.1016/j.humpath.2006.08.017


View previous. 6 of 31 View next.

Advertisement