Advertisement
Journal Home
Search for

Volume 40, Issue 12, Pages 1693-1698 (December 2009)


View previous. 9 of 27 View next.

A pathological reassessment of organ-confined, Gleason score 6 prostatic adenocarcinomas that progress after radical prostatectomy

Hiroshi Miyamoto, MD, PhDa, David J. Hernandez, MDb, Jonathan I. Epstein, MDabcCorresponding Author Informationemail address

Received 4 March 2009; received in revised form 27 April 2009; accepted 5 May 2009. published online 17 August 2009.

Summary 

Prior studies of radical prostatectomies have reported a small percentage of men with biochemical progression after radical prostatectomy showing organ-confined, Gleason Score 6. One might predict that this should virtually never occur. We identified 2551 (1983-2005) radical prostatectomies coded by the urologists at our institution as pathologically organ-confined, Gleason score 6 cancer with more than 1 year of follow-up. We re-examined histopathogically the serially sectioned and completely embedded radical prostatectomy specimens of 38 men who developed biochemical recurrence defined as a single prostate-specific antigen level of 0.2 ng/mL or greater. In 27 (71%) of 38 of cases, pathology re-review showed higher grade or stage than coded by the urologists. These included 10 cases of organ-confined with Gleason pattern 4 as either the primary or secondary pattern; 9 cases of organ-confined, Gleason score 6 with tertiary pattern 4 (in 4 cases, tertiary pattern 4 was described in the initial pathology report); 5 cases of Gleason score 7 plus extraprostatic extension; 1 case of Gleason score 6 with focal extraprostatic extension; and 2 cases with positive margins due to intraprostatic incision (listed in the initial pathology report). The remaining 11 cases were true organ-confined, Gleason score 6 tumors, but none of the patients developed systemic disease. Most prior reports of organ-confined, Gleason score 6 with progression are undergraded (upgrading with revision of Gleason system), understaged (difficulty recognizing focal extraprostatic extension), or suffer from situations with ambiguous staging (intraprostatic incision) or grading (tertiary pattern 4 or 2 + 4 = 6). Even for the rare true organ-confined, Gleason score 6 (no pattern 4) tumor with supposed biochemical progression, some may be false-positive progression based on low post-radical prostatectomy prostate-specific antigen levels and minute tumors that seem highly improbable to progress. With accurate pathologic evaluation, men with organ-confined, Gleason score 6 (no pattern 4) prostate cancer can be told that their risk of progression is very rare (0.4%).

a The Department of Pathology, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21231, USA

b The Department of Urology, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21231, USA

c The Department of Oncology, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21231, USA

Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Department of Pathology, The Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD 21231, USA.

PII: S0046-8177(09)00163-4

doi:10.1016/j.humpath.2009.05.001


View previous. 9 of 27 View next.

Advertisement